Part 2: Treating Vulnerabilities As Business Risks Accelerates Remediation
Technical leaders often view security vulnerabilities as just another defect in the backlog. However, this mindset is limiting and can lead to inefficient remediation. Unlike regular software bugs, which affect functionality, security vulnerabilities expose an organization to threats, making them business risks.
Why vulnerabilities should not be treated as just bugs:
Bugs typically have two options: fix or ignore.
Vulnerabilities represent risk and require a broader decision-making approach.
Fixing every vulnerability without assessing business impact is inefficient.
A risk-based approach ensures that resources are used effectively to reduce overall security exposure.
Instead of asking, "How do we fix this bug?" teams should ask, "How do we best manage this risk?"
Vulnerabilities Are Risks, Not Just Bugs
Key Differences Between Bugs and Vulnerabilities:
Definition
A software defect affecting functionality.
A weakness that can be exploited by attackers.
Impact
Causes system errors or performance issues.
Leads to security breaches, data loss, or downtime.
Resolution Options
Fix it or leave it as tech debt.
Multiple options: fix, mitigate, delegate, or accept.
Priority Decision
Based on usability & performance.
Based on risk, and impact.
Because vulnerabilities introduce business risks, they must be managed using a structured risk response approach rather than a simple "fix or ignore" strategy.
The Four Ways to Handle Risk
Security risk management offers four strategies for dealing with vulnerabilities:
1. Eliminate the Risk (Fix the Vulnerability)
The best solution when practical.
Examples:
Fixing the root cause of the vulnerability: for example using parametrized SQL statements instead of concatenating strings to fix SQL injection or using contextual output encoding to fix Cross-Site Scripting vulnerabilities.
Removing unused or unnecessary services: Disabling or uninstalling outdated services that expand the attack surface without providing business value.
Refactoring insecure code: Eliminating risky code patterns such as hardcoded credentials, SQL injection-prone queries, or improper authentication flows.
Deploying secure configurations: Enforcing secure defaults and best practices for software, such as turning off directory listings in web servers or disabling weak encryption ciphers.
Pros: Permanently resolves the issue.
Cons: May not always be feasible due to cost or complexity.
Best for: Critical, High and Medium risk issue
2. Delegate the Risk (Transfer Responsibility)
Shifts the security burden to a third party.
Examples:
Relying on a third-party authentication provider: Offloading authentication and authorization to providers like Auth0, Okta, or AWS Cognito instead of managing in-house identity security.
Leveraging security controls from external APIs and SDKs: Using vetted libraries for cryptography, payment processing, or secure communication rather than building security-sensitive features from scratch. (link)
Relying on a DDoS protection service: Utilizing cloud-based services like Cloudflare, AWS Shield, or Akamai to mitigate distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Pros: Allows specialized teams or services to handle security, reducing internal effort.
Cons: Requires clear agreements and trust in third parties.
Best suited for: Issues that will take a long time to resolve.
3. Mitigate the Risk (Reduce Impact or Likelihood)
When fixing is not feasible, implement safeguards to reduce risk with a compensating control.
Examples:
Deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF): Provides a layer of protection for web applications from malicious requests and automated attacks. WAFs makes it harder to exploit certain vulnerabilities which reduces the likelihood of exploitation.
Using managed endpoint security solutions: Implementing endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions such as CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, or SentinelOne to offload threat detection and response.
Encrypting sensitive data: Ensuring that data at rest is encrypted to mitigate exposure in case of a breach. While this might not fix the original problem, it makes the risk less of a problem.
Pros: Reduces potential damage and buys time for a long-term solution.
Cons: Does not completely eliminate the risk.
Best for: Medium and Low severity issues
4. Accept the Risk (Document and Monitor It)
Used when the risk is low or the cost of fixing it is too high or when business needs outweighs a security risk.
Examples:
Low-risk vulnerabilities in non-critical systems: A minor vulnerability in an internal tool used by a small team with no sensitive data exposure.
Legacy systems with limited exploitation potential: If a system is air-gapped or has sufficient compensating controls, fixing certain vulnerabilities may not be necessary.
Compensating for vulnerabilities with external controls: If a known issue in a component cannot be fixed, a security team may choose to accept the risk but mitigate its impact by monitoring and restricting access.
Pros: Saves resources for more critical vulnerabilities.
Cons: Must be carefully evaluated and monitored.
Best for: Low-severity issues
The Benefits of Treating Vulnerabilities as Risks
1. Prioritization of Critical Issues
Instead of addressing every vulnerability, teams can focus on high-impact and high-likelihood threats first.
Example: Prioritizing an exposed database vulnerability over a minor UI security issue.
2. Faster, More Effective Remediation
Security teams can allocate resources efficiently by choosing the right approach (fix, mitigate, delegate, or accept).
Example: Instead of spending months fixing a low-risk issue, a compensating control (like a WAF) might reduce risk instantly.
3. Alignment with Business Strategy
Risk-based decision-making ensures security efforts align with business priorities.
Example: A company focused on compliance may prioritize fixing vulnerabilities affecting regulatory requirements.
4. Clearer Communication with Stakeholders
Security leaders can frame issues in terms of business risk when communicating with upper management or other stakeholders rather than just "fixing bugs".
Example: Presenting a vulnerability’s risk in financial terms helps executives make informed decisions.
Conclusion
Viewing vulnerabilities as business risks—not just software defects—leads to better decision-making, faster remediation, and more strategic security efforts. Rather than defaulting to "fix everything," technical leaders can apply the most efficient risk response strategy:
✅ Eliminate high-risk vulnerabilities where possible. ✅ Delegate security responsibilities when feasible. ✅ Mitigate risks using compensating controls. ✅ Accept low-impact risks with proper documentation.
This approach ensures smarter resource allocation, stronger security posture, and better business outcomes. Next time a vulnerability report arrives, ask: What’s the best way to manage this risk?
Last updated
Was this helpful?